Kathmandu— Russia has issued a stern warning to the United Kingdom, threatening “consequences” over the provision of drones to Ukraine that have been employed in long-range attacks within Russia. The Russian embassy in London stated on Monday that British actions would be met with repercussions proportional to their support for what it termed Kiev’s “terrorist machinery.” This follows reports indicating Ukrainian use of drones, including those originating from British companies, to strike key infrastructure such as oil refineries and logistics facilities inside Russia, escalating tensions between the two nations.

Escalating Drone Warfare

Ukraine has significantly increased its attacks within Russian territory this year, targeting military industrial and energy facilities in an effort to disrupt Moscow’s war funding and bring the conflict closer to Russian citizens. According to Russia's Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokeswoman Maria Zakharova, drones containing UK components or configurations have been used in these attacks, including one on the Kamensky Plant, a Russian military-industrial facility. These strikes have also targeted commercial infrastructure like Wildberries warehouses, with Ukraine alleging they are used to supply Russian military components – claims denied by both the company and the Kremlin.

UK Support for Ukraine’s Defense

Britain has been a leading provider of military aid to Ukraine since Russia's invasion in 2022. In April, the UK announced its largest-ever drone package for Ukraine, delivering at least 120,000 drones encompassing long-range strike, intelligence, logistics, and maritime capabilities. This was followed by a £752 million ($996m) funding package in June to supply an additional 150,000 drones by the end of 2026. The UK also pioneered the provision of modern Western battle tanks – Challenger 2 models – and Storm Shadow long-range cruise missiles to Ukraine.

Russian Threats and Potential Retaliation

Former Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Andrei Fedorov suggested that “consequences” could include direct attacks on British territory, asserting that many Kremlin military advisors believe NATO would not forcefully respond. He pointed to the potential influence of Donald Trump, suggesting he might prevent a collective NATO response. Russia’s embassy has not specified what form these consequences might take, but options could range from targeting British interests abroad and escalating cyberattacks to more direct military action. Prime Minister Andy Burnham affirmed that the UK would continue its full support for Ukraine despite the warnings.

NATO Dynamics and Article 5

The possibility of Russia attacking Britain raises questions about NATO’s response. Fedorov suggested Moscow might view the UK as a participant in the war, justifying retaliation. While Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty stipulates that an attack on one member is considered an attack on all, concerns exist regarding potential inaction due to political instability within the alliance and Trump's past criticisms of NATO. Conversely, Article 4 only requires consultation among members if a threat is perceived, without guaranteeing military action.

The UK government has maintained its steadfast support for Ukraine despite Russia’s threats, leaving the situation poised for further escalation as long-range drone attacks continue and Moscow weighs its response.

(With inputs from Al Jazeera)

Originally published on abcnews.com.np.