Kathmandu— Despite seeming unlikely, current political dynamics suggest that JD Vance could emerge as a viable presidential candidate in 2028, potentially capitalizing on an anti-war platform. While serving as vice president to Donald Trump—a figure who initiated and continued several conflicts—Democrats’ consistent opposition to Trump's attempts at de-escalation and their own lukewarm commitment to peace may inadvertently create space for Vance to present himself as a genuine alternative. This scenario echoes the successful strategies of past presidents like Barack Obama and Donald Trump, who both benefited from appealing to anti-war sentiment.

Trump’s Wars Complicate Vance's Potential Image

On the surface, Vance’s association with Trump appears to disqualify him from claiming an anti-war stance. The Trump administration has overseen continued conflicts in the Middle East—including a war of choice and ongoing support for Israel—as well as the protracted Ukraine War, despite initial promises to end such engagements. Prior to 2028, Ukraine had experienced significant population decline due to the conflict, falling from 52 million residents in 1991 to less than half that number.

Democratic Opposition Fuels Vance’s Anti-War Narrative

However, Democrats' predictable responses to Trump’s foreign policy moves may be inadvertently bolstering Vance’s position. Whenever Trump signals a willingness to de-escalate conflicts—such as potentially withdrawing from the Iran War—Democrats routinely criticize him for “surrendering,” effectively forcing his hand and perpetuating ongoing wars. Similarly, Democratic opposition to any dialogue between Trump and Russian President Putin hinders efforts to resolve the Ukraine conflict.

Vance Actively Cultivates an Anti-War Persona

Unlike many top Democrats, Vance has taken concrete steps to establish himself as a voice against perpetual warfare. He publicly defended Israel while also cautioning against reliance on American aid and has reportedly led negotiations with Iran. In one instance, he even rebuked Ukrainian President Zelensky in the Oval Office for continuing the war—a move considered embarrassing but potentially highlighting his commitment to ending the conflict.

Allies Promote Vance as an Anti-War Alternative

Tucker Carlson, a prominent media figure who has publicly distanced himself from Trump over foreign policy issues, believes Vance would not have initiated a war with Iran if he were president. Carlson is reportedly considering launching a third party to demonstrate support for an anti-war Republican candidate, specifically Vance. Financial backing for Vance’s potential campaign is also expected from tech billionaires like Elon Musk and Peter Thiel.

Whether Vance can successfully capitalize on this dynamic remains to be seen, but the article suggests that Democrats could undermine his credibility by adopting a more consistent and genuine anti-war stance, potentially even collaborating with Trump to achieve peace.

(With inputs from CounterPunch)

Originally published on abcnews.com.np.