Kathmandu— Columnist David Ignatius of The Washington Post has once again called for a more aggressive stance against Iran, advocating for continued military action to reopen the strategic waterway, the Strait of Hormuz. His recommendations come at a time when many experts and critics argue that such measures are counterproductive and could escalate into prolonged conflicts.

Echoing Trump's Optimism

Ignatius has been a consistent supporter of President Donald Trump’s approach to international relations, particularly in the context of Iran. He echoed Trump’s optimism about achieving peace deals and emphasized the need for military intervention when diplomatic efforts faltered. Ignatius praised Trump’s negotiation tactics with Russia and Ukraine, despite the lack of tangible progress or resolution.

Ignoring International Opposition

Despite widespread international criticism and opposition to U.S. actions in Iran, Ignatius remains steadfast in his belief that military intervention is necessary. He calls for an international coalition to support U.S. efforts and suggests leveraging China’s influence through President Xi Jinping's upcoming visit. However, critics argue that such approaches ignore the complex geopolitical realities and potential long-term consequences.

Challenges of Protracted War

The column fails to address the strategic and tactical challenges inherent in prolonged military engagements. Trump’s decision to support Prime Minister Netanyahu’s pursuit of regime change in Iran was based on a flawed assumption that victory would be swift and decisive. This optimism contrasts sharply with the reality faced by both Russia and Israel, where initial expectations of quick victories have given way to protracted conflicts.

(With inputs from CounterPunch)

Originally published on abcnews.com.np.